Kerry Fraser is megszolalt mindket eset kapcsan

Az interferirol:

Fraser went frame by frame to show what a referee would be thinking about. He said the question you must ask yourself — in real time — is “was any contact from Point on the goalkeeper avoidable?”

Fraser said you have to take into account the force of the push from behind, the speed and distance to the goalie. Could Point have altered his direction or minimized the impact?

“So the correct answer? All based on the ref’s look in real time based on his position and focus in the moment,” Fraser said. “His perception of the play. Seeing the push in relation to Point’s speed and close proximity to the top of the crease, it is most reasonable to deduce that Point could not have altered his direction to reasonably avoid contact. In that case, no penalty would be warranted for goalie interference. However, refs are instructed to be alert to goalie interference and to protect the goalies! Seeing the velocity and extent of the crash, it is very understandable why a ref would rule in favor of goalie interference. That should not negate the shove/cross-check from behind by the Islander D! He therefore could/should also be subject to a penalty. Nothing or a minor penalty each!”

Epp ez a szubjektiv szar okozza a rengeteg ossze-vissza iteletet.

---

A too many men-rol meg ezt talalta mondani:

“No. 5 is deemed a legal change within five feet of the bench with player stepping off the ice. The puck is in the end zone, so unless No. 5 played the puck or made contact with an opponent, then that change is deemed legal.”

Ez utobbit nem igazan ertem, hiszen ezzel csak a 7. embertol szabadultunk meg, amit eddig is tudtunk. Ugyanakkor No. 6 az Hedman, aki a passzt adta Kucherov-nak. :nemtudom: